1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2003 Rover City
To start off, 2003 Rover City is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2003 Rover City. (84 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2003 Rover City. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 375 kg more than 2003 Rover City. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Rover City, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (233 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Rover City. (119 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Rover City.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 2003 Rover City | |
| Make | Dodge | Rover |
| Model | Challenger | City |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1405 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 84 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 119 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 37 L |
