1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2003 ZAZ Wagon

To start off, 2003 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 670 kg more than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Dodge Challenger 2003 ZAZ Wagon
Make Dodge ZAZ
Model Challenger Wagon
Year Released 1969 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3687 cc 1091 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 123 HP 50 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.6:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1415 kg 745 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 3830 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1570 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2330 mm