1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2004 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (351 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Panda. (70 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Panda.
Because 2004 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Panda. (145 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2004 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Dodge | Fiat |
Model | Challenger | Panda |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6974 cc | 1251 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1630 mm |