1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2004 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2004 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Challenger | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3060 mm |