1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 425 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (352 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Challenger | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 352 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 87 L |