1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (331 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1352 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (422 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Challenger | Ram |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 5621 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 509 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 2864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 132 L |