1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2005 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2005 Ford Mondeo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2005 Ford Mondeo. (149 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Mondeo.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mondeo (374 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2005 Ford Mondeo | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Challenger | Mondeo |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 352 Nm | 374 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.3 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 94.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 59 L |