1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (351 HP) has 141 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 292 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (529 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (344 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Challenger | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6974 cc | 4013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 344 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 1917 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 85 L |