1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 396 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Challenger | Dingo |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2450 mm |