1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 309 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor. (346 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Challenger | Endeavor |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 3835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 346 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 81 L |