1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 599 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (421 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. (395 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2005 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Challenger | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5562 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 421 Nm | 395 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 2074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |