1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 280 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (382 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Challenger | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1846 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 87 L |