1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2006 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.

Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Dodge Challenger 2006 Ford Ranger
Make Dodge Ford
Model Challenger Ranger
Year Released 1969 2006
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6286 cc 2299 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 143 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 422 Nm 209 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3750 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.7:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4820 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2840 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 59 L