1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2006 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (351 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2006 Honda CR-V. (156 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 123 kg more than 2006 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda CR-V. (217 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2006 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Dodge | Honda |
Model | Challenger | CR-V |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6974 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1452 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 58 L |