1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2006 Rover 75

To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (235 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger.

Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (421 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Dodge Challenger 2006 Rover 75
Make Dodge Rover
Model Challenger 75
Year Released 1969 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5562 cc 4601 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 235 HP 256 HP
Torque 421 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4800 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 65 L