1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2006 Toyota Ractis
To start off, 2006 Toyota Ractis is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Ractis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Ractis. (158 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Ractis.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2006 Toyota Ractis | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Challenger | Ractis |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6974 cc | 1299 cc |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1780 mm |