1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2007 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2007 Holden Commodore is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2007 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Challenger | Commodore |
Year Released | 1969 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 422 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |