1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2007 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2007 Toyota Tundra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota Tundra (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (421 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Toyota Tundra. (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2007 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Challenger | Tundra |
Year Released | 1969 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5562 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 421 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 100 L |