1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden UTE. (340 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Challenger | UTE |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 261 HP |
| Torque | 422 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
