1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2008 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,699 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2008 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (233 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2008 Isuzu I-350 | |
Make | Dodge | Isuzu |
Model | Challenger | I-350 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 3699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 328 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 75 L |