1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2008 Land Rover Discovery
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Discovery weights approximately 600 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2008 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (545 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Land Rover Discovery. (300 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Land Rover Discovery.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2008 Land Rover Discovery | |
Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
Model | Challenger | Discovery |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 2495 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 545 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 19.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 93 L |