1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 105 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Challenger | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 352 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.3 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 16.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |