1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 615 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (545 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 440 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Challenger | Clio |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 1149 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 545 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |