1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2009 Ford Escape
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Escape (171 HP @ 6550 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 504 kg more than 2009 Ford Escape.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Escape (302 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (233 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2009 Ford Escape | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Challenger | Escape |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2975 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6550 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 62 L |