1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Colorado. (313 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Challenger | Colorado |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 422 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |