1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2009 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Patriot. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Patriot.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 2009 Jeep Patriot | |
| Make | Dodge | Jeep |
| Model | Challenger | Patriot |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 148 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
