1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP) has 132 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Challenger | Pixo |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2360 mm |