1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2011 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2011 Fiat Panda is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2011 Fiat Panda. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2011 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 426 kg more than 2011 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Fiat Panda. (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2011 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Dodge | Fiat |
Model | Challenger | Panda |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 35 L |