1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2011 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2011 Nissan Leaf is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2011 Nissan Leaf | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Challenger | Leaf |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4445 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |