1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2011 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2011 Suzuki Equator is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2011 Suzuki Equator. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2011 Suzuki Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 591 kg more than 2011 Suzuki Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Suzuki Equator. (171 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Suzuki Equator.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2011 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Challenger | Equator |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |