1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (156 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (230 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Dodge | Chevrolet |
Model | Challenger | Captiva |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 352 Nm | 230 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |