1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2012 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2012 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2012 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2012 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 2012 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Dodge | Proton |
| Model | Challenger | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 422 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2610 mm |
