1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2012 Renault Modus
To start off, 2012 Renault Modus is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2012 Renault Modus. (97 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Modus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 402 kg more than 2012 Renault Modus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Modus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Modus. (127 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Modus.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 2012 Renault Modus | |
| Make | Dodge | Renault |
| Model | Challenger | Modus |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 422 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1164 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 49 L |
