1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2013 Ford Escape
To start off, 2013 Ford Escape is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (351 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2013 Ford Escape. (237 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford Escape. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Escape weights approximately 8 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Escape, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford Escape. (366 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford Escape.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2013 Ford Escape | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Challenger | Escape |
Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6974 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 1633 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4524 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2078 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 57 L |