1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5

To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-5. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 7 kg more than 2013 Mazda CX-5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-5. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-5.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Dodge Challenger 2013 Mazda CX-5
Make Dodge Mazda
Model Challenger CX-5
Year Released 1969 2013
Body Type Convertible Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5208 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 156 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 352 Nm 203 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 99.3 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.1 mm 91 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 13.0 : 1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1495 kg 1488 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4555 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 2165 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1710 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 56 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]