1969 Dodge Dart vs. 2003 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XF is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Dart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Dart would be higher. At 7,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Dart weights approximately 5 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Dart | 2003 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Dart | XF |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3248 cc | 7000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1240 mm |