1969 Dodge Dart vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Dart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Dart would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Dart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 152 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Dart. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Dart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Dart. (299 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Dart.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Dart | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Dart | UTE |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 299 Nm | 340 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |