1969 Fairthorpe TX-S vs. 1956 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,153 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S (112 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1956 Jeep CJ5. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S should accelerate faster than 1956 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 393 kg more than 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S.
Because 1956 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S. (160 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1956 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Fairthorpe TX-S.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Fairthorpe TX-S | 1956 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Fairthorpe | Jeep |
Model | TX-S | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3153 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1350 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 787 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2060 mm |