1969 Ferrari Dino vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ferrari Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ferrari Dino would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ferrari Dino (193 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ferrari Dino should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 540 kg more than 1969 Ferrari Dino.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ferrari Dino. (225 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ferrari Dino. 2003 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1969 Ferrari Dino has manual transmission. 1969 Ferrari Dino will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Ferrari Dino 2003 Cadillac CTS
Make Ferrari Cadillac
Model Dino CTS
Year Released 1969 2003
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 2419 cc 2597 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 193 HP 179 HP
Engine RPM 7600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 225 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 5500 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92.5 mm 83.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 60 mm 79.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.2:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1080 kg 1620 kg
Vehicle Length 4240 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1140 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 64 L