1969 Fiat 124 vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Fiat 124. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Fiat 124 would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (391 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 1969 Fiat 124. (110 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1969 Fiat 124. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1672 kg more than 1969 Fiat 124. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Fiat 124. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 426 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Fiat 124. (134 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Fiat 124. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1969 Fiat 124 has manual transmission. 1969 Fiat 124 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Fiat 124 | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Fiat | Land Rover |
Model | 124 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1608 cc | 4197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 391 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 560 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.1:1 |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 2632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 88 L |