1969 Fiat 128 vs. 2010 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Fiat 128. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Fiat 128 would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Stavic (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1969 Fiat 128. (54 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1969 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Stavic weights approximately 1098 kg more than 1969 Fiat 128. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 SsangYong Stavic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 SsangYong Stavic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SsangYong Stavic (340 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Fiat 128. (77 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Fiat 128. 2010 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1969 Fiat 128 has manual transmission. 1969 Fiat 128 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Fiat 128 | 2010 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Fiat | SsangYong |
| Model | 128 | Stavic |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1115 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 77 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 86.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 138 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1923 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 80 L |
