1969 Fiat 130 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Fiat 130. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Fiat 130 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1969 Fiat 130. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1969 Fiat 130. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 353 kg more than 1969 Fiat 130. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Fiat 130. (255 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Fiat 130.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Fiat 130 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
| Model | 130 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3238 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 255 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 102.1 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1953 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 68 L |
