1969 Fiat 600 vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 1981 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Fiat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Fiat 600 would be higher. At 2,292 cc (2 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (120 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1969 Fiat 600. (23 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1969 Fiat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 320 kg more than 1969 Fiat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (162 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Fiat 600. (45 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1981 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Fiat 600.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Fiat 600 1981 Mazda Cosmo
Make Fiat Mazda
Model 600 Cosmo
Year Released 1969 1981
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 767 cc 2292 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 2 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 23 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 45 Nm 162 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 830 kg 1150 kg
Vehicle Length 3540 mm 4670 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1590 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 2620 mm