1969 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Fiat Campagnola (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Fiat Campagnola should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 520 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Fiat Campagnola (128 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Fiat Campagnola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Fiat Campagnola | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Fiat | Zastava |
| Model | Campagnola | 102 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2160 mm |
