1969 Fiat Dino vs. 1972 Volvo 140
To start off, 1972 Volvo 140 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Fiat Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Fiat Dino would be higher. At 2,419 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Fiat Dino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Fiat Dino (180 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1972 Volvo 140. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Fiat Dino should accelerate faster than 1972 Volvo 140. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Volvo 140 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1969 Fiat Dino.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Fiat Dino (216 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Volvo 140. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1969 Fiat Dino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Fiat Dino | 1972 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Dino | 140 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2419 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2610 mm |