1969 Fiat Dino vs. 2013 Ford F-150
To start off, 2013 Ford F-150 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Fiat Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Fiat Dino would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford F-150 (405 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1969 Fiat Dino. (177 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1969 Fiat Dino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1325 kg more than 1969 Fiat Dino. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Fiat Dino. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford F-150 (588 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Fiat Dino. (220 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2013 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Fiat Dino.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Fiat Dino | 2013 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Dino | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2418 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 405 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 588 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.5 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 60 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 2729 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5603 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2464 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1994 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3378 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 98 L |
