1969 Ford 17 vs. 2004 Renault Scenic

To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford 17 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Scenic (74 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1969 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic weights approximately 629 kg more than 1969 Ford 17. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford 17 (113 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 1969 Ford 17 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Scenic.

Compare all specifications: