1969 Ford 17 vs. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100
To start off, 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford 17 would be higher. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 weights approximately 1565 kg more than 1969 Ford 17.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford 17 | 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 17 | 100 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 8998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 84.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 2640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 80 L |
