1969 Ford 17 vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford 17 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1969 Ford 17. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford 17.
Because 1969 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford 17. (113 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford 17 | 2008 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | 17 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
