1969 Ford Capri vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1969 Ford Capri is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1969 Ford Capri. (123 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Capri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1969 Ford Capri. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Capri (199 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1969 Ford Capri will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Capri | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Capri | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2294 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 199 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 60.1 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
